September 28, 2002 (ROME) This summer the president of the Italian state
broadcasting system, RAI, addressed the national congress of the National
Alliance, the right-wing party led principally by what are known as
"post-Fascists." The official, Antonio Baldassarre, announced that it was
time to "rewrite history" that is, as it is presented on Italian
television.
"The old RAI represented only one culture and not others," he said. "Often,
they didn't tell real history, but told fables, offered one-sided
interpretations." This exhortation before a party whose older leaders were
youthful Fascists had a very clear meaning: no more black-and-white
representations of anti-Fascists and partisan fighters as noble patriots
and Fascists as evil criminals.
History, cynics say, is written by the winners. At the end of World War II,
the anti-Fascists who had been kept out of public life for 20 years
got to tell their story and name streets and piazzas after their heroes.
But with the return of a center-right coalition last year, whose second-largest
party is the National Alliance, many on the right feel that it is their turn
now.
Domenico Fisichella, a professor of political science at the University of
Rome and a senator representing the National Alliance, believes that the
political changes have opened up new possibilities. "The right has given
up Fascism as a model," he said. "And at the same time, the historiographical
debate on the Fascist period has grown more serene, more balanced." Mr.
Fisichella first proposed forming the National Alliance in 1994 out of what
had, up to that time, been a neo-Fascist party known as the Italian Social
Movement. He is one of several scholars who have offered a more mixed judgment
of the Fascist era.
"It was clearly an authoritarian government but not a totalitarian one,"
he said in a telephone interview. "Fascism committed serious errors that
led to the tragedy we all know," he added, referring to the alliance with
Hitler and World War II. "But it also passed a great deal of social and economic
legislation that was quite valid, that was innovative for its time and even
copied in part by the New Deal in ending the Depression. The gospel of left-wing
historiography failed to make these distinctions and simply bunched Fascism
with Nazism."
An end to the demonization of Fascism by scholars created an opportunity
for Italy's old neo-Fascist party to move from the political fringe toward
the center. The leadership of the National Alliance has seized it and gone
out of its way to distance itself from Fascism. The party leader, Gianfranco
Fini, has criticized Fascism's racial laws and has traveled to both Auschwitz
and Israel. Earlier this year, he publicly retracted a statement he had made
10 years ago calling Benito Mussolini "the greatest statesman of the 20th
century."
Moreover, Mr. Fini proclaimed April 25 the date in 1945 when World
War II ended in Italy a day for all Italians to celebrate the return
of liberty and democracy. This was a major concession: most of the leaders
of the old Italian Social Movement and many in the newer National Alliance
had been repubblichini, young volunteers in the Republic of Salo, the government
of die-hard Fascists who fought alongside Mussolini and Hitler after the
official Italian government had switched sides and thrown in its lot with
the Anglo-American allies.
The two movements may seem contradictory the post-Fascists being more
critical of Fascism and the historians treating it more kindly but
they are intimately related. The rehabilitation of the National Alliance
would probably not have been possible without a gradual softening of the
portrayal of Fascism both in the scholarly literature and the popular media.
If the older leaders of the National Alliance were regarded as war criminals
like the Nazis, it would have been impossible for them to occupy positions
in the government. But now one former repubblichino, Mirko Tremaglia, is
even a minister of the current government.
A less unfavorable view of the Mussolini era is prevailing, partly because
of the political necessity of integrating the former neo-Fascists into the
mainstream. For example, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, whose Forza Italia
(Go, Italy) party leads the government, justifies his partnership with the
National Alliance by saying that the good in Fascism must be remembered as
well as the bad....
This trend is a marked change. For much of the postwar period, Fascism was
portrayed as a criminal regime imposed by Mussolini and his squads of Black
Shirts a 20-year "parenthesis" in the history of a democratic Italy
that began with independence in 1861. This view was challenged during the
1970's by scholars like Mr. Fisichella but, most important, by Renzo De Felice,
a historian who devoted more than 30 years to a multivolume biography of
Mussolini and whose work dominated the Italian historiography of Fascism
until his death a few years ago.
"De Felice offered a broader and less moralistic picture of Fascism," said
Roberto Vivarelli, a professor of history at the University of Florence.
"I think he showed that Fascism was not extraneous to the history of Italy,
not a parenthesis."
De Felice insisted that the demonization of Fascism failed to explain adequately
its rise and hold on one of the principal countries of Europe. Mussolini,
he argued, enjoyed popularity and the "consensus" of most of the country
up until World War II. De Felice stressed the differences between Italian
Fascism and German National Socialism. Fascism, despite its claim to being
a "totalitarian" regime, was, he argued, a softer dictatorship that retained
much of the liberal bureaucracy, made peace with the Roman Catholic Church
and did not share Hitler's obsession with racism and the Jews. (Mussolini,
he observed, adopted racial laws only on the eve of the war, largely to cement
his alliance with Germany.)
Even some historians with impeccable anti-Fascist credentials feel that the
re-examination of Fascism has led to a more rounded, less doctrinaire history.
Claudio Pavone, a former resistance fighter and historian, for example, annoyed
some anti-Fascists when he portrayed the struggle between partisans and
repubblichini at the end of World War II as a civil war instead of a war
of liberation. It was a war that pitted Italians against other Italians,
and tens of thousands of repubblichini, he argued, volunteered out of genuine
patriotic fervor, however unpleasant or misguided...
Nicola Tranfaglia, a professor of history at the University of Turin, argues
that De Felice overstated Il Duce's popular support. "I think it's wrong
to speak of `consensus' in a dictatorship," he said. Mussolini enjoyed a
measure of popularity, even adulation, Mr. Tranfaglia said, but never dared
put it to the test of free elections....
..(F)ar more publicity has gone to books pushing an increasingly revisionist
point of view. In 1996 in his book "La Morte della Patria" ("The Death of
the Fatherland"), Ernesto Galli della Loggia, a professor of history at the
University of Perugia and a prominent conservative political commentator,
even blamed those who fought alongside the Anglo-American allies for the
death of national feeling in Italy.
A strange confirmation of the reversal of the usual opposition between "good
partisans" and "evil Fascists" came in 1997 when a Rome magistrate opened
a war-crimes investigation of the partisans who had blown up a convoy of
German soldiers during World War II. The judge, Maurizio Pacioni, maintained
that the partisans were responsible for the death of an 11-year-old boy
accidentally killed by the partisans' bomb, but shelved the case because
of an amnesty for crimes from the Fascist period. (Members of the National
Alliance had encouraged the boy's family to pursue the case.)
Nonetheless, what had always been regarded as a heroic episode had now, in
the eyes of some, been criminalized.A romantic version of the Republic of
Salo as noble loyalists to a lost cause and a new critical
view of the partisan struggle have already seeped into the popular media,...
one RAI broadcast that portrayed the repubblichini as more morally coherent,
patriots who refused to change sides even when defeat was imminent, while
the partisans were seen to be opportunistic turncoats who were jumping on
the winning bandwagon," ...
Curiously, in a period in which so many are bending over backward to be fair
to Fascism, it is now left to a former neo-Fascist, Mr. Fini, the leader
of the National Alliance, to state that the anti-Fascist victory ending World
War II was a victory for all Italians.
Alexander Stille's books include Benevolence and Betrayal: Five
Italian Jewish Families Under Fascism, Excellent Cadavers: The Mafia and
the Death of the First Italian Republic, and most recently, The Future of
the Past. (August 2002)
In Italy, a Kinder, Gentler Fascism
www.nytimes.com/2002/09/28/arts/28FASC.html?todaysheadlines